Skip to main content
Top10Grid
Top 10 Worst Microtransaction Practices in Gaming
Video Game

Top 10 Worst Microtransaction Practices in Gaming

Some games charge $70 upfront and then ask for hundreds — or even thousands — more through in-game purchases: loot boxes that work like slot machines, pay-to-win upgrades that lock out free players, and cosmetics ripped from the original game and resold. This list ranks the 10 worst microtransaction practices in gaming history, drawing on documented player spending data and years of industry controversy. Which offender do you think is the most shameless? Cast your vote below.

2026173 views
Topic

Top 10 lists on this topic

Be the first

Current Rankings

Share this list
173 views
Share:
Get ranking updates
Vote items up or down — rankings update instantly

Get the weekly gaming rundown

The most-voted lists across every category — curated weekly. Join the early readers.

  • The most-voted lists across every category
  • Exclusive early-access to new categories
  • Reader picks vs editorial picks compared

No spam. One email per week. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions About Microtransactions in Gaming

Are loot boxes considered gambling? Multiple governments have ruled that randomised loot boxes constitute gambling. Belgium and the Netherlands banned paid loot boxes in FIFA and several other titles; the UK Gambling Commission completed a formal review in 2023. These rulings directly impacted games featured on this list.

Which game sparked the biggest public backlash? Star Wars Battlefront II (2017) generated what became the most-downvoted comment in Reddit history when EA defended its pay-to-win system. Within days of launch, EA temporarily disabled all paid loot boxes under pressure from players and Disney.

How much can a player realistically spend on Diablo Immortal? Gaming researchers and outlets including PC Gamer calculated that fully maxing out a character in Diablo Immortal could cost upward of $100,000 USD — the most expensive progression system ever documented in a mainstream title.

Do microtransactions hurt game quality? Research published in *Computers in Human Behavior* found that perceived fairness of monetisation models significantly impacts player satisfaction and long-term retention, suggesting predatory practices carry measurable costs beyond the ethical dimension.

Readers Also Ranked

More Lists Like This

Discussion

Have a take on this ranking?

Comments are how the argument actually happens here. Posting one needs a free account — it takes about a minute.

No comments yet.

The first comment sets the terms of the argument.

Would your top 10 look different?

Publish your own ranking of this topic. Your list gets its own page, and readers vote on it the same way you just voted on this one.

Build your own Top 10

People Also Explore

Because you're viewing Gaming

You might also like

More in Gaming

See all