Stonewalling During Arguments
One of Gottman's "Four Horsemen." A death spiral disguised as peace.
Stonewalling, defined as shutting down, going silent, or refusing to engage during conflict, is a highly destructive communication pattern. Dr. John Gottman's extensive research identifies stonewalling as one of the "Four Horsemen" that predict relationship failure with a staggering 93.6% accuracy. This differs significantly from a requested break to cool down; stonewalling is a unilateral withdrawal often used as punishment. The recipient typically feels dismissed and invisible, escalating their distress and creating a negative feedback loop that is 5-times more damaging than occasional disagreements. Over time, chronic stonewalling erodes the relationship's foundation, leading to unresolved issues and emotional detachment, and it is even more harmful than defensiveness, which ranks as the second most destructive horseman.
Comments on "Stonewalling During Arguments"
Have a take on this ranking?
Comments are how the argument actually happens here. Posting one needs a free account — it takes about a minute.
No comments yet.
The first comment sets the terms of the argument.