#8
PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
PNAS's contributed track allows National Academy members to bypass standard review with hand-picked editors, resulting in 30% higher acceptance rates than regular submissions. A 2025 audit revealed that 70% of contributed papers involve a dynamic where the author selects reviewers, creating a self-reinforcing citation bubble.
0
Comments on "PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)"
Have a take on this ranking?
Comments are how the argument actually happens here. Posting one needs a free account — it takes about a minute.
No comments yet.
The first comment sets the terms of the argument.