Sam Altman may control our future – can he be trusted?

It argues that a single figure's influence over AI policy poses a systemic risk, with Altman directly shaping decisions affecting an estimated $1 trillion in projected AI market value by 2030. The critique cuts deeper than typical tech profiles by naming specific conflicts of interest, such as Altman's dual roles at OpenAI and Worldcoin, and contrasts sharply with A cryptography engineer's perspective on quantum computing timelines's policy-neutral technical analysis, demanding accountability rather than just data.