#3
Where does engineering go? Retreat findings and insights [pdf]
This PDF retreat breaks from big-data orthodoxy, achieving 49 points and 18 comments with a contrarian thesis: 76% of scale-focused engineering projects fail to deliver measurable craft improvements. Compared to Jemalloc un-abandoned by Meta's corporate-undermining theme, this document provides a more data-driven roadmap, citing 14 specific case studies where scaling back complexity yielded 30% faster iteration cycles.
Photos (1)
![Where does engineering go? Retreat findings and insights [pdf]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftop10grid.com%2Fmedia%2Fimages%2Fitems%2Fcmmtly1f70008g701gkhn34b0.jpg&w=2048&q=75)
Comments on "Where does engineering go? Retreat findings and insights [pdf]"
Have a take on this ranking?
Comments are how the argument actually happens here. Posting one needs a free account — it takes about a minute.
No comments yet.
The first comment sets the terms of the argument.