Skip to main content
Top10Grid
#4

ATMs didn't kill bank teller jobs, but the iPhone did

ATMs didn’t kill bank teller jobs, but the iPhone did, a sharp analysis that reexamines automation’s true impact on employment. The data shows that despite 200,000 ATM installations in the U.S., teller roles grew by 12% between 1995 and 2005, while the iPhone triggered a 30% decline beginning in 2008. When compared to Reversing memory loss via gut-brain communication’s organic medical solutions, this piece argues that smartphones disrupted retail banking more profoundly than any machine, forcing 244 comments on HN’s thread. Accounting for inflation, the iPhone era saved banks $50 billion annually in labor costs, a figure that dwarfs ATM-era savings.

Share:

Photos (1)

ATMs didn't kill bank teller jobs, but the iPhone did

Comments on "ATMs didn't kill bank teller jobs, but the iPhone did"

Have a take on this ranking?

Comments are how the argument actually happens here. Posting one needs a free account — it takes about a minute.

No comments yet.

The first comment sets the terms of the argument.